Sebastian Kurz, Chairman of the Austrian People’s Party, Christian Kern, Chairman of the Social Democratic Party, and Hans Christian Strache, of the far-right Freedom Party, participate in a television debate during the 2017 Austrian election campaign. Source: Wikimedia
Austria’s recent election was a big success for the country’s Conservatives and the far-right. Sebastian Kurz, the 31-year-old foreign minister is tipped to become the country’s next Chancellor – in a coalition with the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ). His rise, however, was only possible with the help of the media. Austria’s press, and the tabloids in particular, played a key role in the country’s move to the right.
How we ended up where we are: Austria’s political situation
For many observers Austria’s recent swerve to the right is not surprising. The country has long grappled with sizeable nationalist and ultra-conservative tendencies. The stigma usually associated with extreme nationalist parties in other European countries was never evident in the Alpine nation and this helped the far-right flourish. Turned into a potent populist party by their former leader Jörg Haider, the FPÖ – a party founded by Nazis – has been key in pushing the country’s political discourse further to the right in recent years.
These efforts appear to have paid off in the recent election. Exploiting a smouldering xenophobia and a deep-seated cultural and social angst of losing one’s “Heimat” and social benefits to immigrants, both the FPÖ under their leader Heinz-Christian Strache and Sebastian Kurz’s People’s Party ÖVP led successful campaigns which thrived on jingoistic notions, and a fear of Islam and immigration.
The gamble worked: the ÖVP gained 31.5% of the vote, the FPÖ 26% – only narrowly losing out to the Social Democrats (SPÖ) who achieved 26.9% but suffered heavy losses which cost them the chancellory. Although the ÖVP and FPÖ are still negotiating over the terms of a coalition deal, there is little doubt that Austria’s future political fate will lie in the hands of a staunchly nationalist–conservative government.
Source: BMI
The role of the media in Austria’s politics
While not the only factor, Austria’s media played a key role in bringing about the result.
Austria’s notorious tabloid press – most famously the Kronen Zeitung, Heute and Österreich – are powerful players in the national media landscape and read widely. Famous for their sensationalist framings and for publishing misleading or false information, they have long developed strong ties to Austria’s conservative and right-wing political scene – an alliance which partially helps explain the toxic political climate. During the election campaign, Sebastian Kurz, in particular, benefitted from the support of these tabloids who were besotted with (and helped create) his “trendy” and youthful image.
However, simply blaming the tabloid press for the triumph of Austrian right-wing populism would be short-sighted. For example, in the weeks before the election, nearly all media coverage focused on a Facebook smear-campaign against Sebastian Kurz, instigated by a former consultant to the re-election campaign of the centre-left Chancellor Christian Kern (SPÖ).
As the Washington Post’s Luisa Beck and Griff Witte have pointed out, the disclosure of this attempt to thwart Kurz’s hopes of becoming chancellor “rocked the normally sedate world of Austrian politics in the election’s final weeks, crowding out debate over the issues and clogging Austrian newspapers and news shows with endless discussion of who knew what, and when.” Some say that had the media focused on real issues, rather than directing all their attention towards the scandal, the country’s politics might have taken a different turn.
Another issue was the Austrian media’s toothlessness. For one, the aforementioned scandal was not exposed through investigative reporting but through the story being leaked to the press – from political opponents. Some commentators also noted that many Austrian journalists failed to ask critical questions during the campaign, making life easy for the parties and their candidates. For example, the right-wing FPÖ had markedly toned down their usually radical demeanour, most likely in order not to scare away more moderate voters. Yet, critical coverage of this tactic, and the FPÖ more generally, was largely absent.
In the end, it was the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung which published an investigative dossier on the neo-nazi past of the FPÖ’s candidate, “HC” Strache.
Austria: a difficult country for journalists
Then again, while Austria’s media certainly has to ask itself painful questions after the election, simply blaming the press would be unfair and blissfully ignorant of wider issues in the country which affect journalistic work.
Austria is not a country that can pride itself on supporting critical and investigative journalism. A Freedom of Information Act, as for instance in the UK or in Germany, is not enshrined in law. As a consequence, journalists depend on the goodwill of civil servants and other state officials in their quest to unearth material. Interviews with politicians are generally reviewed and edited by PR managers. Finally, the media scene and the political world are strongly intertwined. For better or worse, potential scoops, access to information and people heavily depend on a journalist’s personal network – and his or her willingness to play along.
To accuse the Austrian media of solely being responsible for the election outcome would be overstated. Many other factors were at play, with the country’s press having a crucial but not decisive role. Yet, their failings during the election campaign cast a doubt on their ability to hold Austrian politicians and parties to account in future. As Austria prepares to take over the EU presidency in the second half of 2018 and with looming cuts to social benefits, cultural programmes and funding for the public service media, a strong and independent press is more needed than ever before. So far, however, it seems that this remains wishful thinking.
You might also be interested in: The social media echo-chamber powering Austria’s far-right
Sign up to the EJO’s regular monthly newsletter
Views expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the EJO
How Austria’s Tabloids Helped the Far-Right Win the Election
December 7, 2017 • Comment, Media and Politics, Recent • by Felix Simon and Bettina Figl
Sebastian Kurz, Chairman of the Austrian People’s Party, Christian Kern, Chairman of the Social Democratic Party, and Hans Christian Strache, of the far-right Freedom Party, participate in a television debate during the 2017 Austrian election campaign. Source: Wikimedia
Austria’s recent election was a big success for the country’s Conservatives and the far-right. Sebastian Kurz, the 31-year-old foreign minister is tipped to become the country’s next Chancellor – in a coalition with the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ). His rise, however, was only possible with the help of the media. Austria’s press, and the tabloids in particular, played a key role in the country’s move to the right.
How we ended up where we are: Austria’s political situation
For many observers Austria’s recent swerve to the right is not surprising. The country has long grappled with sizeable nationalist and ultra-conservative tendencies. The stigma usually associated with extreme nationalist parties in other European countries was never evident in the Alpine nation and this helped the far-right flourish. Turned into a potent populist party by their former leader Jörg Haider, the FPÖ – a party founded by Nazis – has been key in pushing the country’s political discourse further to the right in recent years.
These efforts appear to have paid off in the recent election. Exploiting a smouldering xenophobia and a deep-seated cultural and social angst of losing one’s “Heimat” and social benefits to immigrants, both the FPÖ under their leader Heinz-Christian Strache and Sebastian Kurz’s People’s Party ÖVP led successful campaigns which thrived on jingoistic notions, and a fear of Islam and immigration.
The gamble worked: the ÖVP gained 31.5% of the vote, the FPÖ 26% – only narrowly losing out to the Social Democrats (SPÖ) who achieved 26.9% but suffered heavy losses which cost them the chancellory. Although the ÖVP and FPÖ are still negotiating over the terms of a coalition deal, there is little doubt that Austria’s future political fate will lie in the hands of a staunchly nationalist–conservative government.
Source: BMI
The role of the media in Austria’s politics
While not the only factor, Austria’s media played a key role in bringing about the result.
Austria’s notorious tabloid press – most famously the Kronen Zeitung, Heute and Österreich – are powerful players in the national media landscape and read widely. Famous for their sensationalist framings and for publishing misleading or false information, they have long developed strong ties to Austria’s conservative and right-wing political scene – an alliance which partially helps explain the toxic political climate. During the election campaign, Sebastian Kurz, in particular, benefitted from the support of these tabloids who were besotted with (and helped create) his “trendy” and youthful image.
However, simply blaming the tabloid press for the triumph of Austrian right-wing populism would be short-sighted. For example, in the weeks before the election, nearly all media coverage focused on a Facebook smear-campaign against Sebastian Kurz, instigated by a former consultant to the re-election campaign of the centre-left Chancellor Christian Kern (SPÖ).
As the Washington Post’s Luisa Beck and Griff Witte have pointed out, the disclosure of this attempt to thwart Kurz’s hopes of becoming chancellor “rocked the normally sedate world of Austrian politics in the election’s final weeks, crowding out debate over the issues and clogging Austrian newspapers and news shows with endless discussion of who knew what, and when.” Some say that had the media focused on real issues, rather than directing all their attention towards the scandal, the country’s politics might have taken a different turn.
Another issue was the Austrian media’s toothlessness. For one, the aforementioned scandal was not exposed through investigative reporting but through the story being leaked to the press – from political opponents. Some commentators also noted that many Austrian journalists failed to ask critical questions during the campaign, making life easy for the parties and their candidates. For example, the right-wing FPÖ had markedly toned down their usually radical demeanour, most likely in order not to scare away more moderate voters. Yet, critical coverage of this tactic, and the FPÖ more generally, was largely absent.
In the end, it was the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung which published an investigative dossier on the neo-nazi past of the FPÖ’s candidate, “HC” Strache.
Austria: a difficult country for journalists
Then again, while Austria’s media certainly has to ask itself painful questions after the election, simply blaming the press would be unfair and blissfully ignorant of wider issues in the country which affect journalistic work.
Austria is not a country that can pride itself on supporting critical and investigative journalism. A Freedom of Information Act, as for instance in the UK or in Germany, is not enshrined in law. As a consequence, journalists depend on the goodwill of civil servants and other state officials in their quest to unearth material. Interviews with politicians are generally reviewed and edited by PR managers. Finally, the media scene and the political world are strongly intertwined. For better or worse, potential scoops, access to information and people heavily depend on a journalist’s personal network – and his or her willingness to play along.
To accuse the Austrian media of solely being responsible for the election outcome would be overstated. Many other factors were at play, with the country’s press having a crucial but not decisive role. Yet, their failings during the election campaign cast a doubt on their ability to hold Austrian politicians and parties to account in future. As Austria prepares to take over the EU presidency in the second half of 2018 and with looming cuts to social benefits, cultural programmes and funding for the public service media, a strong and independent press is more needed than ever before. So far, however, it seems that this remains wishful thinking.
You might also be interested in: The social media echo-chamber powering Austria’s far-right
Sign up to the EJO’s regular monthly newsletter
Views expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the EJO
Tags: Austria, Austrian politics, Christian Kern, FPO, Hans Christian Strache, Heute, journalists, Kronen Zeitung, media, Osterreich, ÖVP, Politics, Sebastian Kurz, tabloid, tabloid newspapers
About the Author
Felix Simon and Bettina Figl
Related Posts
The media revolution in Afghanistan
When The Pressure Becomes Too Great – Why...
Five Things You Need To Know About Journalism’s...
Network Propaganda: How A Right-Wing Media Ecosystem Helped...
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
Study shows European mainstream media ignore humanitarian crises in the...
May 22, 2024
Journalism students see an industry in crisis. It’s time to...
April 18, 2024
Interview: How a summer school is sowing seeds for strong...
March 14, 2024
AI advances have left news publishers fearing for their business...
February 23, 2024
Big comeback for organisation providing invaluable networks to journalism students
January 31, 2024
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
13 Things Newspapers Can Learn From Buzzfeed
April 10, 2015
How Data Journalism Is Taught In Europe
January 19, 2016
Why Journalism Needs Scientists (Now)
May 13, 2017
Digitalisation: Changing The Relationship Between Public Relations And Journalism
August 6, 2015
The Lemon Dealers
June 27, 2007
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
China: Coronavirus and the media
April 15, 2020
How the Media Can Benefit From Pinterest
March 18, 2013
Storing – Or Losing – Digital News?
November 23, 2015
Unconventional, Irreverent Independent Newspaper To Go ‘Off Stone’ And Online
February 14, 2016
Operated by
Funded by
Newsletter
Find us on Facebook
Archives
Links