In spite of a decidedly uncertain media landscape, talk radio – conservative talk radio in particular – maintains a high level of success in the U.S.
Often the soundtrack to highway traffic jams, petulance-pushing talk radio programs continue to appeal to millions of listeners stranded in cars. Gridlocked drivers call on personalities like Rush Limbaugh and ever-honorable cultural humorist Dr. Laura Schlessinger to pass the time, to gather information about moonie liberals and global warming hoaxes, or to seek morally responsible dating advice.
Offering a level of interactivity by inviting callers to spar on-air, successful radio shows require not only provocative hosts, but provocative callers.
While debating the quality or veracity of select political programming is surely disheartening, being able to make the distinction between informed, news-oriented dialogue and contrived, real-ish entertainment remains critical. With that in mind, consider a service offered by Premier On Call (see here for cached version of mysterious vanishing website). Premier On Call auditions actors and matches them with talk shows in need of particular types of callers. Actors are then given scripts and asked to sign confidentiality agreements.
As reported by Liel Leibovitz of Tablet Magazine:
Premiere On Call was a service offered by Premiere Radio Networks, the largest syndication company in the United States and a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, the entertainment and advertising giant. Premiere syndicates some of the more sterling names in radio, including Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity.
‘Premiere On Call is our new custom caller service,’ read the service’s website, which disappeared as this story was being reported…’We supply voice talent to take/make your on-air calls, improvise your scenes or deliver your scripts. Using our simple online booking tool, specify the kind of voice you need, and we’ll get you the right person fast. Unless you request it, you won’t hear that same voice again for at least two months, ensuring the authenticity of your programming for avid listeners.’
One might deduce, then, that perhaps a few novel on-air gems could be less than authentic.
Of course talk radio is a business, and thus motivated by revenue. The equation is simple: conflict boosts ratings and ratings equal money. Self-adulating sourheads – dreaded by business travelers and window-seat passengers alike – are somehow valued pillars of authoritry on the radio.
Conservative talk shows may thrive in the U.S., but then again, so does professional wrestling. A combative combination of choreography and improvisation may look like the real thing (kind of), but how long can a person really be asked to disregard the physical realities of a piledriver?
–
Talk Radio Smackdown
February 17, 2011 • Ethics and Quality, Public Relations • by Kate Nacy
Often the soundtrack to highway traffic jams, petulance-pushing talk radio programs continue to appeal to millions of listeners stranded in cars. Gridlocked drivers call on personalities like Rush Limbaugh and ever-honorable cultural humorist Dr. Laura Schlessinger to pass the time, to gather information about moonie liberals and global warming hoaxes, or to seek morally responsible dating advice.
Offering a level of interactivity by inviting callers to spar on-air, successful radio shows require not only provocative hosts, but provocative callers.
While debating the quality or veracity of select political programming is surely disheartening, being able to make the distinction between informed, news-oriented dialogue and contrived, real-ish entertainment remains critical. With that in mind, consider a service offered by Premier On Call (see here for cached version of mysterious vanishing website). Premier On Call auditions actors and matches them with talk shows in need of particular types of callers. Actors are then given scripts and asked to sign confidentiality agreements.
As reported by Liel Leibovitz of Tablet Magazine:
Premiere On Call was a service offered by Premiere Radio Networks, the largest syndication company in the United States and a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, the entertainment and advertising giant. Premiere syndicates some of the more sterling names in radio, including Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity.
‘Premiere On Call is our new custom caller service,’ read the service’s website, which disappeared as this story was being reported…’We supply voice talent to take/make your on-air calls, improvise your scenes or deliver your scripts. Using our simple online booking tool, specify the kind of voice you need, and we’ll get you the right person fast. Unless you request it, you won’t hear that same voice again for at least two months, ensuring the authenticity of your programming for avid listeners.’
One might deduce, then, that perhaps a few novel on-air gems could be less than authentic.
Of course talk radio is a business, and thus motivated by revenue. The equation is simple: conflict boosts ratings and ratings equal money. Self-adulating sourheads – dreaded by business travelers and window-seat passengers alike – are somehow valued pillars of authoritry on the radio.
Conservative talk shows may thrive in the U.S., but then again, so does professional wrestling. A combative combination of choreography and improvisation may look like the real thing (kind of), but how long can a person really be asked to disregard the physical realities of a piledriver?
–
Tags: Clear Channel Communications, Conservative Talk Radio, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, Glenn Beck, Liel Leibovitz, Political Commentators, Premiere On Call, Premiere Radio Networks, Professional Wrestling, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Smackdown, Tablet Magazine, Talk Radio, U.S. Media
About the Author
Kate Nacy
Related Posts
The New Barons. Power, Politics, and Media
Working the Bongo Beat
Everyone Breath
U.S. Coverage of Conflict and the Media Attention...
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
Misinformation: why it may not necessarily lead to bad behaviour
February 24, 2023
Study shows how Austria’s community broadcasters are supporting democracy
February 17, 2023
Student Perspective: Tackling hate speech and the harmful narratives of...
January 26, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
13 Things Newspapers Can Learn From Buzzfeed
April 10, 2015
How Data Journalism Is Taught In Europe
January 19, 2016
Why Journalism Needs Scientists (Now)
May 13, 2017
Digitalisation: Changing The Relationship Between Public Relations And Journalism
August 6, 2015
Can Robots Do Public Interest Journalism?
February 11, 2015
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
HackPack: How A Virtual Newsroom Transforms Journalism
June 26, 2018
Deepr: Where Readers Commission Journalists
November 13, 2014
The New Journalism? Investigative and Digital
May 18, 2010
Paradise Papers: The Power of Collaboration in Investigative Journalism
December 3, 2017
The Manipulation of Wikipedia
February 27, 2014
Operated by
Funded by
Newsletter
Find us on Facebook
Archives
Links