Armin Wolf (left), Austria’s star presenter, is taking the country’s vice-chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache (right) to court – © Wikimedia, CC0
Austria’s far-right Freedom Party FPÖ has long had a fraught relationship with the press. Following the party’s rise to power as part of a right-wing conservative coalition after the Austrian election, this conflict has only intensified. Is the party waging a war against the press and independent journalism?
Judging from recent events, it wouldn’t be hard to get this impression. A few weeks ago, Austria’s public broadcaster ORF filed a lawsuit against the deputy head of the government, the FPÖ’s Heinz-Christian Strache. A couple of days earlier ORF news presenter Armin Wolf – one of the best-known faces on Austrian television – had brought his own lawsuit against Strache.
Satire? – How To Disguise Attacks On The Press
The reason? A Facebook post by the vice-chancellor in which he had posted a picture of Wolf with the words: “There is a place where lies become news. It’s the ORF”, mimicking an advertisement for the broadcaster. The post continues with the line: “The best of fake news, lies and propaganda, pseudo-culture and forced licensing fees. Regional and international. On TV, radio and the Facebook profile of Armin Wolf.” It was a brazen attack on the broadcaster and one of its most prominent figureheads. Unsurprisingly, the ORF immediately demanded an apology and issued a stern rebuttal.
“Vice-chancellor Strache accused ORF, by doctoring ORF advertising material, of spreading fake news, lies and propaganda in all its media,” ORF director general Alexander Wrabetz said in a brief statement, adding that the post “discredited the journalistic work of 800 ORF journalists” and was “libellous and damaging to [ORF’s] reputation”.
While Strache – who has since taken down the post, agreed on an out-of-court settlement with Wolf and apologised — has argued that his post was meant as satire and also labelled as such (with the one-word caption “Satire!”), the ORF is determined to uphold its suit against the country’s deputy head of government.
A War Against Austria’s Free Press
Strache’s post fits into a larger picture of continued attacks on the broadcaster and the press which the FPÖ accuses of having a left-wing bias – a claim which mirrors those of other right-wing populist parties in the rest of Europe. The FPÖ also wants to scrap the licensing fee which funds the ORF – a move which would most likely amount to a closure of the broadcaster. A similar initiative against the Swiss public broadcaster SRF recently collapsed after the country overwhelmingly voted in support of the licensing fee. In Switzerland, the campaign against the SRF was heavily supported by the SVP, the country’s right-wing populist FPÖ-equivalent.
Strache’s favourite medium for attacks on the press are his social media accounts. His Facebook site, as Austrian journalist Alexander Fanta has noted, is key to the Freedom Party’s influence as it allows Strache to sideline legacy media and reach supporters directly. A range of “independent” blogs and websites such as Unzensuriert.at (“Uncensored”) – often co-run by FPÖ staff or supporters – deliver further ammunition in the form of ideologically conform articles and commentary. Very much like in the case of Donald Trump, social media aids Strache in getting his and his party’s agenda into Austria’s mainstream media – leading to somewhat ironic situations whenever his complaints about legacy media and the ORF are reported on in the very same.
Wonderful Bedfellows
Yet, not all outlets are “at war” with Austria’s right-wing populists. As Bettina Figl and I have written in the past, Austria’s notorious tabloid press – most famously the Kronen Zeitung, Heute and Österreich – are powerful players in the national media landscape and have long developed strong ties to the Freedom Party. Especially the Kronen Zeitung, a tabloid with a strong right-wing nationalist stance, has benefitted from Strache (and vice versa) whose sharing of the tabloid’s articles has driven up the their traffic.
While legacy media and the public broadcaster are increasingly under fire from the right, some outlets clearly needn’t worry. As long as they publish pieces which fall in line with the FPÖ’s positions and help to push their populist agenda they can be sure of the benevolence of the new rulers in the Austrian parliament.
You may also be interested in Martina Topinkova’s “The Risks of Being An Investigative Journalist in Central Europe”.
Sign up for the EJO’s regular monthly newsletter.
Undermining Austria’s Press, One Post At A Time
March 15, 2018 • Comment, Media and Politics, Press Freedom • by Felix Simon
Armin Wolf (left), Austria’s star presenter, is taking the country’s vice-chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache (right) to court – © Wikimedia, CC0
Austria’s far-right Freedom Party FPÖ has long had a fraught relationship with the press. Following the party’s rise to power as part of a right-wing conservative coalition after the Austrian election, this conflict has only intensified. Is the party waging a war against the press and independent journalism?
Judging from recent events, it wouldn’t be hard to get this impression. A few weeks ago, Austria’s public broadcaster ORF filed a lawsuit against the deputy head of the government, the FPÖ’s Heinz-Christian Strache. A couple of days earlier ORF news presenter Armin Wolf – one of the best-known faces on Austrian television – had brought his own lawsuit against Strache.
Satire? – How To Disguise Attacks On The Press
The reason? A Facebook post by the vice-chancellor in which he had posted a picture of Wolf with the words: “There is a place where lies become news. It’s the ORF”, mimicking an advertisement for the broadcaster. The post continues with the line: “The best of fake news, lies and propaganda, pseudo-culture and forced licensing fees. Regional and international. On TV, radio and the Facebook profile of Armin Wolf.” It was a brazen attack on the broadcaster and one of its most prominent figureheads. Unsurprisingly, the ORF immediately demanded an apology and issued a stern rebuttal.
“Vice-chancellor Strache accused ORF, by doctoring ORF advertising material, of spreading fake news, lies and propaganda in all its media,” ORF director general Alexander Wrabetz said in a brief statement, adding that the post “discredited the journalistic work of 800 ORF journalists” and was “libellous and damaging to [ORF’s] reputation”.
While Strache – who has since taken down the post, agreed on an out-of-court settlement with Wolf and apologised — has argued that his post was meant as satire and also labelled as such (with the one-word caption “Satire!”), the ORF is determined to uphold its suit against the country’s deputy head of government.
A War Against Austria’s Free Press
Strache’s post fits into a larger picture of continued attacks on the broadcaster and the press which the FPÖ accuses of having a left-wing bias – a claim which mirrors those of other right-wing populist parties in the rest of Europe. The FPÖ also wants to scrap the licensing fee which funds the ORF – a move which would most likely amount to a closure of the broadcaster. A similar initiative against the Swiss public broadcaster SRF recently collapsed after the country overwhelmingly voted in support of the licensing fee. In Switzerland, the campaign against the SRF was heavily supported by the SVP, the country’s right-wing populist FPÖ-equivalent.
Strache’s favourite medium for attacks on the press are his social media accounts. His Facebook site, as Austrian journalist Alexander Fanta has noted, is key to the Freedom Party’s influence as it allows Strache to sideline legacy media and reach supporters directly. A range of “independent” blogs and websites such as Unzensuriert.at (“Uncensored”) – often co-run by FPÖ staff or supporters – deliver further ammunition in the form of ideologically conform articles and commentary. Very much like in the case of Donald Trump, social media aids Strache in getting his and his party’s agenda into Austria’s mainstream media – leading to somewhat ironic situations whenever his complaints about legacy media and the ORF are reported on in the very same.
Wonderful Bedfellows
Yet, not all outlets are “at war” with Austria’s right-wing populists. As Bettina Figl and I have written in the past, Austria’s notorious tabloid press – most famously the Kronen Zeitung, Heute and Österreich – are powerful players in the national media landscape and have long developed strong ties to the Freedom Party. Especially the Kronen Zeitung, a tabloid with a strong right-wing nationalist stance, has benefitted from Strache (and vice versa) whose sharing of the tabloid’s articles has driven up the their traffic.
While legacy media and the public broadcaster are increasingly under fire from the right, some outlets clearly needn’t worry. As long as they publish pieces which fall in line with the FPÖ’s positions and help to push their populist agenda they can be sure of the benevolence of the new rulers in the Austrian parliament.
You may also be interested in Martina Topinkova’s “The Risks of Being An Investigative Journalist in Central Europe”.
Sign up for the EJO’s regular monthly newsletter.
Tags: Attacks on the Press, Austria, Austrian Freedom Party, FPO, Freedom Party, Journalism, media independence, ORF, Press freedom, Public Broadcasting
About the Author
Felix Simon
Related Posts
Interview: The exiles fighting for transparency and an...
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of...
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom...
Opinion: Why we need a manifesto for a...
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
Study shows European mainstream media ignore humanitarian crises in the...
May 22, 2024
Journalism students see an industry in crisis. It’s time to...
April 18, 2024
Interview: How a summer school is sowing seeds for strong...
March 14, 2024
AI advances have left news publishers fearing for their business...
February 23, 2024
Big comeback for organisation providing invaluable networks to journalism students
January 31, 2024
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
13 Things Newspapers Can Learn From Buzzfeed
April 10, 2015
How Data Journalism Is Taught In Europe
January 19, 2016
Why Journalism Needs Scientists (Now)
May 13, 2017
Digitalisation: Changing The Relationship Between Public Relations And Journalism
August 6, 2015
The Lemon Dealers
June 27, 2007
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
The role of whistleblowing in the “datafied society”
April 17, 2019
Journalists Stand for Election in Ukraine
October 3, 2014
How Journalists Evade Censors
November 4, 2014
Turkmenistan: False Hope
for Media Freedom
February 8, 2013
Journalistic innovation: a Portuguese solution
November 11, 2019
Operated by
Funded by
Newsletter
Find us on Facebook
Archives
Links