In spite of a decidedly uncertain media landscape, talk radio – conservative talk radio in particular – maintains a high level of success in the U.S.
Often the soundtrack to highway traffic jams, petulance-pushing talk radio programs continue to appeal to millions of listeners stranded in cars. Gridlocked drivers call on personalities like Rush Limbaugh and ever-honorable cultural humorist Dr. Laura Schlessinger to pass the time, to gather information about moonie liberals and global warming hoaxes, or to seek morally responsible dating advice.
Offering a level of interactivity by inviting callers to spar on-air, successful radio shows require not only provocative hosts, but provocative callers.
While debating the quality or veracity of select political programming is surely disheartening, being able to make the distinction between informed, news-oriented dialogue and contrived, real-ish entertainment remains critical. With that in mind, consider a service offered by Premier On Call (see here for cached version of mysterious vanishing website). Premier On Call auditions actors and matches them with talk shows in need of particular types of callers. Actors are then given scripts and asked to sign confidentiality agreements.
As reported by Liel Leibovitz of Tablet Magazine:
Premiere On Call was a service offered by Premiere Radio Networks, the largest syndication company in the United States and a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, the entertainment and advertising giant. Premiere syndicates some of the more sterling names in radio, including Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity.
‘Premiere On Call is our new custom caller service,’ read the service’s website, which disappeared as this story was being reported…’We supply voice talent to take/make your on-air calls, improvise your scenes or deliver your scripts. Using our simple online booking tool, specify the kind of voice you need, and we’ll get you the right person fast. Unless you request it, you won’t hear that same voice again for at least two months, ensuring the authenticity of your programming for avid listeners.’
One might deduce, then, that perhaps a few novel on-air gems could be less than authentic.
Of course talk radio is a business, and thus motivated by revenue. The equation is simple: conflict boosts ratings and ratings equal money. Self-adulating sourheads – dreaded by business travelers and window-seat passengers alike – are somehow valued pillars of authoritry on the radio.
Conservative talk shows may thrive in the U.S., but then again, so does professional wrestling. A combative combination of choreography and improvisation may look like the real thing (kind of), but how long can a person really be asked to disregard the physical realities of a piledriver?
–
Talk Radio Smackdown
February 17, 2011 • Ethics and Quality, Public Relations • by Kate Nacy
In spite of a decidedly uncertain media landscape, talk radio – conservative talk radio in particular – maintains a high level of success in the U.S.
Often the soundtrack to highway traffic jams, petulance-pushing talk radio programs continue to appeal to millions of listeners stranded in cars. Gridlocked drivers call on personalities like Rush Limbaugh and ever-honorable cultural humorist Dr. Laura Schlessinger to pass the time, to gather information about moonie liberals and global warming hoaxes, or to seek morally responsible dating advice.
Offering a level of interactivity by inviting callers to spar on-air, successful radio shows require not only provocative hosts, but provocative callers.
While debating the quality or veracity of select political programming is surely disheartening, being able to make the distinction between informed, news-oriented dialogue and contrived, real-ish entertainment remains critical. With that in mind, consider a service offered by Premier On Call (see here for cached version of mysterious vanishing website). Premier On Call auditions actors and matches them with talk shows in need of particular types of callers. Actors are then given scripts and asked to sign confidentiality agreements.
As reported by Liel Leibovitz of Tablet Magazine:
Premiere On Call was a service offered by Premiere Radio Networks, the largest syndication company in the United States and a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, the entertainment and advertising giant. Premiere syndicates some of the more sterling names in radio, including Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity.
‘Premiere On Call is our new custom caller service,’ read the service’s website, which disappeared as this story was being reported…’We supply voice talent to take/make your on-air calls, improvise your scenes or deliver your scripts. Using our simple online booking tool, specify the kind of voice you need, and we’ll get you the right person fast. Unless you request it, you won’t hear that same voice again for at least two months, ensuring the authenticity of your programming for avid listeners.’
One might deduce, then, that perhaps a few novel on-air gems could be less than authentic.
Of course talk radio is a business, and thus motivated by revenue. The equation is simple: conflict boosts ratings and ratings equal money. Self-adulating sourheads – dreaded by business travelers and window-seat passengers alike – are somehow valued pillars of authoritry on the radio.
Conservative talk shows may thrive in the U.S., but then again, so does professional wrestling. A combative combination of choreography and improvisation may look like the real thing (kind of), but how long can a person really be asked to disregard the physical realities of a piledriver?
–
Tags: Clear Channel Communications, Conservative Talk Radio, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, Glenn Beck, Liel Leibovitz, Political Commentators, Premiere On Call, Premiere Radio Networks, Professional Wrestling, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Smackdown, Tablet Magazine, Talk Radio, U.S. Media
About the Author
Kate Nacy
Related Posts
The New Barons. Power, Politics, and Media
Working the Bongo Beat
Everyone Breath
U.S. Coverage of Conflict and the Media Attention...
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
Study shows European mainstream media ignore humanitarian crises in the...
May 22, 2024
Journalism students see an industry in crisis. It’s time to...
April 18, 2024
Interview: How a summer school is sowing seeds for strong...
March 14, 2024
AI advances have left news publishers fearing for their business...
February 23, 2024
Big comeback for organisation providing invaluable networks to journalism students
January 31, 2024
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
13 Things Newspapers Can Learn From Buzzfeed
April 10, 2015
How Data Journalism Is Taught In Europe
January 19, 2016
Why Journalism Needs Scientists (Now)
May 13, 2017
Digitalisation: Changing The Relationship Between Public Relations And Journalism
August 6, 2015
The Lemon Dealers
June 27, 2007
The new tool helping outlets measure the impact of investigative...
October 22, 2023
Audit of British Tory MP demonstrates the power of investigative...
September 13, 2023
The impact of competing tech regulations in the EU, US...
September 12, 2023
Enough ‘doomer’ news! How ‘solutions journalism’ can turn climate anxiety...
August 31, 2023
Student perspective: How Western media embraced TikTok to reach Gen...
August 19, 2023
Lessons from Spain: Why outlets need to unite to make...
July 26, 2023
INTERVIEW: Self-censorship and untold stories in Uganda
June 23, 2023
Student Perspective: Job insecurity at the root of poor mental...
June 9, 2023
The battle against disinformation and Russian propaganda in Central and...
June 1, 2023
Opinion: Why Poland’s rise on the Press Freedom Index is...
May 17, 2023
From ChatGPT to crime: how journalists are shaping the debate...
April 25, 2023
Student perspective: Supporting the journalists who face hopelessness, trauma and...
April 13, 2023
Interview: Why young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina feel they...
March 29, 2023
Humanitarian reporting: Why coverage of the Turkey and Syria earthquakes...
March 8, 2023
How women journalists in Burkina Faso are making a difference...
January 11, 2023
Dispelling the ‘green’ AI myth: the true environmental cost of...
December 29, 2022
New publication highlights the importance of the Black press in...
December 12, 2022
The enduring press freedom challenge: how Japan’s exclusive press clubs...
September 26, 2022
How Journalism is joining forces with AI to fight online...
September 14, 2022
How cash deals between big tech and Australian news outlets...
September 1, 2022
Panel debate: Should journalists be activists?
August 19, 2022
Review: The dynamics of disinformation in developing countries
August 9, 2022
Interview: Are social media platforms helping or hindering the mandate...
July 15, 2022
Policy brief from UNESCO recommends urgent interventions to protect quality...
July 5, 2022
EJO’s statement on Ukraine
February 28, 2022
Kill them with Kindness
November 23, 2010
Digital News Report: Most Europeans Access News Online… And On...
October 23, 2015
Pack to Parliament: Journalism Deserves Public Funding
June 11, 2012
Does Anyone Read Academic Papers?
April 17, 2015
How Free Are We?
April 29, 2010
Operated by
Funded by
Newsletter
Find us on Facebook
Archives
Links