<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EJO - European Journalism Observatory &#187; Advertising &amp; Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.ejo.ch/topics/marketing_advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.ejo.ch</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Price of Credibility</title>
		<link>http://en.ejo.ch/1956/marketing_advertising/the-price-of-credibility</link>
		<comments>http://en.ejo.ch/1956/marketing_advertising/the-price-of-credibility#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rukhshona Nazhmidinova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gayle Kerr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Interactive Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Drennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louise Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queensland University of Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey of Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ejo.ch/?p=1956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The need to be present in social networks leads more companies to desert traditional media and head for the Internet. Yet the game might not be worth the candle, when the medium lacks credibility to the point where it actually makes TV advertising look trustworthy. Louise Kelly, Gayle Kerr, and Judy Drennan from the Queensland [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amberlea/125933822/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3747" title="Ambert's photostream on Flickr" src="http://en.ejo.ch/wp-content/uploads/Money1-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="239" height="181" /></a>The need to be present in social networks leads more companies to desert traditional media and head for the Internet. </strong></p>
<p>Yet the game might not be worth the candle, when the medium lacks credibility to the point where it actually makes TV advertising look trustworthy. Louise Kelly, Gayle Kerr, and Judy Drennan from the Queensland University of Technology conducted a study, published in the <em>Journal of Interactive Advertising</em>, assessing the attitudes of younger audiences with regard to advertising on social networking websites. The results indicate that participants <span id="more-1956"></span>place little to no trust in advertising found in social networks.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that none of the respondents reported negative experiences with online advertising, most believed that clicking through adverts will either invite computer viruses or some form of scam. Several participants report feeling manipulated and disturbed when advertisements open without being clicked by the user. Others feel suspicious when they are asked for personal data and must shut  “offers” down.</p>
<p>According to the study, such distrust is fostered by the fact that anyone is able to publish content and advertisements online. Television and newspapers, on the other hand, require licenses or other forms of official registration, thus reducing audiences’ perceived risk of being tricked.</p>
<p>These attitudes towards online advertising can help traditional media win some time until a new, sustainable business model is developed. Weaknesses – limitations due to higher prices and impersonal advertisement – can easily be turned into strengths.  In the end, the marketing rule is that the cheapest product is not always the best option.</p>
<p>Find the full at the <a href="http://jiad.org/article129">Journal of Interactive Advertising.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.ejo.ch/1956/marketing_advertising/the-price-of-credibility/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictable Future</title>
		<link>http://en.ejo.ch/1798/marketing_advertising/predictable-future</link>
		<comments>http://en.ejo.ch/1798/marketing_advertising/predictable-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rukhshona Nazhmidinova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Falk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurological Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California Los Angeles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ejo.ch/?p=1798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research may allow advertisers to sigh with ease and erase the gap between words and actions. Emily Falk of the University of California Los Angeles and her colleagues have managed to predict the actions of research participants better than participants can themselves. In their study, the scientists took brain scans of 20 volunteers while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/benleto/3378813255/"><img class="alignleft" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3620/3378813255_ce72a1d781.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="230" /></a>New research may allow advertisers to sigh with ease and erase the gap between words and actions. </strong></p>
<p>Emily Falk of the University of California Los Angeles and her colleagues have managed to predict the actions of research participants better than participants can themselves. In their study, the scientists took brain scans of 20 volunteers while reading them information about sunscreen and asking whether they’d use the products during the next week. Surprisingly, only half of the participants were able to correctly predict their future actions. Interpretations of the brain scans found that approximately 75 percent of actual behavior was predicted correctly through the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI).</p>
<p>Results of the study could potentially help in shaping new and sharply efficient advertising <span id="more-1798"></span>strategies. For now, the greatest challenge may lie in convincing consumers to have their brains scanned every once in a while…</p>
<p>Read more at <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2214937420100622">Reuters</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.ejo.ch/1798/marketing_advertising/predictable-future/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Idea Too Early</title>
		<link>http://en.ejo.ch/775/marketing_advertising/an-idea-too-early</link>
		<comments>http://en.ejo.ch/775/marketing_advertising/an-idea-too-early#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Russ-Mohl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Willes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.ejo.ch/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Message, 3/2009 In the mid-90’s, Mark Willes introduced controversial structures to rescue the Los Angeles Times, yet in the end arduous opposition brought him down. Had his strategy been implemented, however, today’s crisis may not be as grave. The days when local newspapers enjoyed regional monopolies are long gone, largely due to the ever-expanding Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message, 3/2009</p>
<p><strong><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-779" title="Willes" src="http://en.ejo.ch/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Willes.jpg" alt="Willes" width="145" height="185" />In the mid-90’s, Mark Willes introduced controversial structures to rescue the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, yet in the end arduous opposition brought him down. Had his strategy been implemented, however, today’s crisis may not be as grave. </strong></p>
<p>The days when local newspapers enjoyed regional monopolies are long gone, largely due to the ever-expanding Internet and rising competition. Punishment for overlooking the  desires of readers is much more severe nowadays, according to online journalism expert Pablo Boczkowski. Journalists may no longer dismiss their publics’ interests without severe punishment.<span id="more-775"></span></p>
<p>Market research became vital in the media business, though journalists and publishers in both Europe and America took far too long to catch on. Publishers were slow to zero in on market research because they generally held unrivaled positions, and those who hold monopolies show little interest for clients, while journalists simply didn’t see market research as something that would augment their profession. Furthermore, experienced editors reflexively view marketing and PR specialists as members of the opposing team. Accepting PR and marketing experts as indispensable facilitators of brand and service promotion remains a difficult leaf to turn.</p>
<p><strong>From cereal producer to publishing boss </strong></p>
<p>Among the first to attempt to pioneer this concept is Mark Willes. Willes was appointed CEO of the Times Mirror empire in 1995, leaving his post with cereal producer General Mills just as things began to look grim for the media group. Sales of the group’s main paper, the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, crashed by 19 percent over the previous four years and threatened to fall under the magical one million mark. Prospects of advertising, which comprised 80 to 85 percent of most U.S. newspapers’ revenue, were weakening as well. Southern California’s armament industry was in a deep crisis after the end of the Cold War and acquisitions in retail trade added to difficulties in finding advertisers.</p>
<p>Mark Willes’ entrance in office led to a cultural revolution where market research was intensified and the editorial staff and the advertising sector were forced to work hand-in-hand. Marketing specialists informed about the editorial planning were assigned to each department of the newsroom. They were supposed to raise more targeted advertising and to improve the company’s marketing strategy. Without having any editorial role, they were also asked to market the editorial content of the newspaper more professionally.</p>
<p>This strategy is best illustrated in the business section, for it was the first to prove that the new concept worked. Collaboration between the editor and the company’s new marketing star, 32-year-old Kelly Ann Sole, succeeded in gaining new readers and 40 percent more advertising for the Tuesday business special. The relaunched business section &#8220;Wall Street California&#8221; focused more on readers’ finance than previously. Willes, generally known for his drastic economies, provided the department with 11 additional journalists.</p>
<p>Another revolutionary Willes move was his creation of a system that would continuously evaluate the performance of each newspaper section.  Willes was clever enough to realize that not each section could be profitable, and he insisted on following readership developments and advertising income for each section and local edition. Previously, the newspaper’s performance was only examined as an entity; now, under Willes’ leadership, each department or local edition evolved into a profit center.</p>
<p><strong>The stock market soars, as do critics </strong></p>
<p>Resonance was strong and ambivalent, and Wall Street loved it. In the media, Willes was subject to more malice and riducule than any publisher before, and the choir of disproving critics was led by the crème de la crème of American journalism. A whole range of celebrities from the media world, among them chief editors of the <em>Washington Post </em>and the <em>New York Times</em>, Ben Bradlee and Max Frankel, as well as famous leftist journalism critic, Ben Bagdikian, were willing to adamantly attack Willes.</p>
<p>A chief fear was that journalism would become dictated by the results of opinion polls, or even worse, that it would soon be guided by advertisement experts. Thus, the sacrosanct wall separating the editing from the advertising, would crumble.</p>
<p>Willes was not completely inculpable for his scandalization. He liked to provoke, for example announcing that he would like to blow up the wall with a bazooka. Indeed, he believed that such institutionalized arrangements were unnecessary and insisted the only thing that counted was the integrity of the working staff. In the <em>Columbia Journalism Review </em>he was quoted suggesting that those who got in his way should leave and instead work at clogging the innovations of his competitors.</p>
<p><strong>Willes the &#8220;cereal killer&#8221; </strong></p>
<p>Contrary of most of his counterparts, Willes had a strategy, which most of them lacked at the time and still do. Daily papers had to fight against competition from booming special-interest journals in order to keep a readership interested in a large spectrum of information. Newspapers neglected marketing and advertising, especially when it came to appealing to different ethnic groups. At that time already, 41 percent of Angelinos were of Hispanic origin and the Asian population was well represented as well.</p>
<p>None of Willes’ critics could prove that Willes compromised his editorial staff. In fact, the most severe criticism of Willes was actually published in the <em>Los Angeles Times</em> itself. Former media editor David Shaw castigated Willes in print, writing that skeptics at the <em>LAT</em> and from all over the branch feared that the structures he put in place would inevitably allow editors of lower stature to be overlooked.</p>
<p>Even the <em>LAT</em>’s arch-rival from the East coast, the <em>New York Times</em>, later acknowledged that fears they had of seeing writers’ integrity harmed by Willes’ tactics had faded. The paper believed that Willes’ practices would lead to his failure in implementing ideas. During his two years as boss of the publishing group, two-thirds of leading reporters and collaborators were either asked to leave or left independently. Willes considered such internal conflicts normal.</p>
<p>Yet Willes displayed humor through the ordeal. During a speech at a conference of U.S. newspaper editors in San Francisco, he listed the different nicknames he’d been awarded by the press. Perhaps the most famous was “Cereal Killer,” a refernce to his human resource management and to his past in the food industry.  Runners-up included “Captain Crunch” and  “Corporate El Nino” which accurately characterized the ways in which he disturbed a lethargic media empire.</p>
<p><strong>Unjustified media turmoil </strong></p>
<p>Willes’ undoing came when he passed a sponsorship contract with the Staples Center, a new sport arena in Los Angeles, without informing his editors. The contract ensured that advertising revenues of a special supplement for the opening of the Staples Center would be split between the newspaper and the sporting events’ organizer. The <em>L.A. Times</em> benefitted from exclusive rights to newspaper sales within the arena and upper-tier Times Mirror personnel received preferences for ticket purchases. However, the sale of advertising for the supplement did not go as well as anticipated. At this point, Willes’ subordinates suggested to devote, instead of the supplement, a special edition of the <em>L.A. Times</em>’ magazine to the sporting venue without informing the editors about the contract – a decision that ultimately led to the final scandalization of Willes.</p>
<p>Looking back at the affair, much of the media turmoil appears unjustified. Indeed, to this day, no media expert has been able to explain what was so disreputable in the act of sponsoring a third party without informing the editors.  There was certainly no attempt to influence the editing, because the editors didn’t know about the contract. The more media journalism established itself in the U.S., the more often newspaper managers and media entrepreneurs became victims of scandalous news coverage once reserved for stars, politicians and CEO’s.</p>
<p>Out of dozens of articles published about the <em>L.A. Times </em>in the most respected newspapers and the specialist publications, none credited the new organization structure for what it really was: the decentralization of a rampant bureaucracy. A bureaucracy, according to <em>LAT</em> columnist Kathy Kristof, that not even the soviet politburo could compete with.</p>
<p><strong>Discredited throughout the branch </strong></p>
<p>The downfall of the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>’ only grew worse after Willes’ departure. Looking back, Willes should be exonerated. What he attempted to implement was innovative and would have helped the newspaper industry make its way out of the crisis. Market research, daily feedback from readership and targeted ad marketing respect editorial plans without influencing the work of editorial departments. Such clever concepts encourage the production of quality journalism in a problematic financial climate.</p>
<p>Had Willes’ tactics been replicated, perhaps America’s mainstream media would be targeting the public’s needs and wishes as they’re failing to do today.  Journalists who followed the herd in scandalizing Willes rather than viewing the situation rationally delivered bullets to their own knees. As his innovative measures were discredited throughout the branch, newspapers sunk deeper and deeper into the crisis.</p>
<p>Translation by Patrick Wilson</p>
<p>Image courtesy of Flickr – <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36152631@N05/3752288428/">Brad Slade </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.ejo.ch/775/marketing_advertising/an-idea-too-early/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We React to the Customer&#8217;s Demands&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://en.ejo.ch/338/marketing_advertising/we-react-to-the-customers-demands-2</link>
		<comments>http://en.ejo.ch/338/marketing_advertising/we-react-to-the-customers-demands-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Russ-Mohl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media & Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classifieds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craicslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neue Zürcher Zeitung, August 22, 2008 How Craigslist Revolutionised the Classifieds Business in the U.S. Some count him among the gravediggers of the daily newspaper, but for many he is the benefactor of all those who are buying or selling, searching or finding, leasing or renting through the classifieds and who, so far, have had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="small">Neue Zürcher Zeitung, August 22, 2008</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><strong>How Craigslist Revolutionised the Classifieds Business in the U.S.</strong></div>
<div>Some count him among the gravediggers of the daily newspaper, but for many he is the benefactor of all those who are buying or selling, searching or finding, leasing or renting through the classifieds and who, so far, have had to pay quite dearly for it – whether they post their small ads in traditional newspapers or on the Internet.</div>
<div></div>
<p><span id="more-338"></span></p>
<div>Craig Newmark, inventor of <em>Craigslist</em>, has revolutionised the classifieds business in the U.S.  In 2004, his company entered the European classifieds market, which, so far, still forms part of the lucrative core business of daily newspapers, advertising journals and city magazines, as well as websites such as Auto or Immoscout.It’s not necessary to memorise Craigslist’s offline address, but the location is quite an impressive case of understatement: 1291, 9th Avenue, San Francisco is the postal address of a rather shabby old building set within a quiet area bordering downtown San Francisco. In other words, it’s a building that would be deemed exceptionally modest by even the smallest of local advertising journals.</p>
<p>Once past the iron fence guarding the main entrance, visitors are greeted by a pair of blue garbage cans. Next follows a narrow flight of stairs which leads to the first floor, where one finds an “office environment” that looks rather like a shared flat inhabited by a bunch of students. No receptionist, nor a chief secretary shielding the company’s CEO from unwanted visitors.  Instead, one is greeted by said CEO himself, a lanky, youthful man who stands two metres tall. Jim Buckmaster is “probably the only CEO” who has ever been described by journalists as “anti-establishment,” and a “communist and a socialist anarchist.” He views himself differently, of course, but doesn’t seem deeply offended by the epithets (otherwise you probably wouldn’t find them on his website).</p>
<p>The Internet certainly opens new possibilities. Today, any individual can post an ad for free on <em><a href="http://www.craiglist.org/" target="_blank">craigslist.org</a></em>, while real estate agents and employers who want to promote their house and job offers have to pay fees. Fees, mind you, which still lie far below the rates that used to apply to the classifieds section before the Internet revolutionised this segment of the advertising market, and before <em>Craigslist</em> revolutionised the Internet.  In the U.S. alone, an impressive 40 million people visit the website each month – almost twice as many as the country’s most successful news website, nytimes.com, manages to attract. The company, which is headed by its founder Craig Newmark, generates annual revenues between $80 and $100 million – according to an estimate by the <em>New York Times</em> (official figures are not available) – and has a staff consisting of a mere 25 people. In the U.S., <em>Craigslist</em> has become the largest platform for small ads in existence, and in terms of visitors it&#8217;s the eighth most frequented English language website in the world.</p>
<p>The earnings lost by <em>Craigslist’s</em> competitors far exceed those gained by Newmark’s successful start-up.  By how much is hard to calculate, since not even the Newspaper Association of America (NAA) gives out specific numbers. To give a rough indication at present the combined classifieds sections of the world’s newspapers generate annual sales in the amount of $14.2 billion. However, almost a third of this business has already deteriorated since the all-time high of $20 billion that was posted in 2000. The statistical records reach as far back as 1950, and they indicate that in no other year were the losses more dramatic than in 2007 when, according to the NAA, they reached a staggering 16.5%, which translates to a sales decrease of $2.8 billion last year alone.</p>
<p>That <em>Craigslist </em>might actually be responsible for a large part of this downward trend is not something Mr. Buckmaster cares to discuss in any detail. “We are merely reacting to the wishes of our community,” he says before outlining the service-orientated nature of his company and enumerating the many advantages Internet-posted small ads have over their paper-based counterparts. The company’s founder Craig Newmark, according to a quote published in the <em>New York Times</em>, also regards the accusation as an “urban myth.”</p>
<p>The company began as a private non-profit initiative launched 13 years ago by Newmark, whose main purpose was to inform friends and acquaintances of events taking place in San Francisco. The subsequent rise was impressive, and over the last two years <em>Craigslist</em> has seen a rapid expansion. Today the company is present in 500 U.S. markets, among them communities with less than 20,000 inhabitants, which means that <em>Craigslist</em> no longer only threatens the big city newspapers, but their small town cousins as well. Moreover, the company seems poised to conquer Europe too. In 2003, a <em>Craigslist</em> branch opened in London, followed by offices in Amsterdam and Paris (2004) as well as in Zurich, Rome, Frankfurt, Madrid and Munich (all 2005). In 2008, 120 cities have been added to this list so far, among them Basel and Bern. In Switzerland, where the company has been active since 2005 (in Zurich and Geneva), <em>Craigslist</em> generates 1 million visits a month.  In the UK, this number already stands at 20 million.</p>
<p>Practically all <em>Craigslist</em> employees devote a large portion of time to the task of keeping the website free of unwanted content. Buckmaster admits that they are not always 100% successful in doing so, given the millions of ads that are posted on <em>Craigslist</em>. While it’s true that a centralised control of the website seems impossible, the CEO stresses that the website’s users are acting quite efficiently as “Internet police” themselves, discovering many ads that run counter to the spirit of the Craigslist project. Once an ad is bookmarked, sophisticated software checks it again and permanently removes the content, if necessary, from the website.</p>
<p>Newmark and Buckmaster seem to embody the symbiosis between counterculture and cyberculture which Fred Turner, a young Assistant Professor in Communication at Stanford, has recently identified as a sign of our times in his commendable book*. Buckmaster is advocating a “low stress business model” based on word-of-mouth and snowballing effects. Hence <em>Craigslist’s</em> refusal to invest in advertising or marketing, of which Buckmaster responds to saying, “People don’t like commercial brakes on television, and they equally don&#8217;t like Internet pop-ups or calls by telemarketers. We can afford the luxury to do totally without it.”  Similarly, the company doesn&#8217;t have PR consultants on its payroll but, instead, it is ready to answer specific questions when contacted by journalists, Buckmaster says.</p>
<p>But aren’t they missing out on many golden opportunities by handling things like this? “If your annual sales increase reaches 100%, growth is no longer one of your top priorities,” the CEO explains. And both he and Newmark seem to agree that their company should remain “low key,” meaning that they’re content with offering Internet users a valuable “community service” without being too keen on building up any kind of “corporate culture.”</p>
<p>Whether they will succeed, however, depends on one of their co-owners who has recently fallen out of favour.  Twenty-eight percent of <em>Craigslist</em> is owned by <a href="http://www.ebay.com/" target="_blank"><em>eBay</em></a>, and a fierce legal battle has flared up between the two companies, with the <em>eBay </em>management accusing Buckmaster and Newmark of deceptive manoeuvres. Neither Buckmaster nor anyone at eBay are ready to discuss the current state of this legal dispute, but <em>eBay</em> has set up a website <em><a href="http://www.kijiji.com/" target="_blank">www.kijiji.com</a></em> that functions along very similar lines as <em>Craigslist</em> and is active both in and outside of the U.S.  At present, the two rivals continue their battle for supremacy by invading each others’ markets.</p>
<p>Like so many successful businesspeople in America, Newmark acts as benefactor by donating money to a variety of projects, specifically those aimed at supporting journalism. Among them you will find websites such as<em> <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/" target="_blank">factcheck.org</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.prwatch.org/" target="_blank">PRWatch.org</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.newstrust.net/" target="_blank">NewsTrust.net</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/" target="_blank">publicintegrity.org</a></em>– all of which are initiatives designed to keep a watchful eye on politicians and their spin doctors, and to make the media more accountable. “Every democratic society relies on a strong free press that is capable of confronting politicians with critical questions and exposing any misuse of power,” Newmark says. Media companies and in particular bloggers often lack the resources that are necessary for serious research and fact-checking, which is why Newmark supports groups “which help preserve a strong journalism.”</p>
<p>Unfortunately <em>Craigslist</em> is making newsrooms everywhere lose more money than Newmark could ever hope to give back to them. On the other hand, anyone in favour of a free market economy will think twice before blaming Newmark and Buckmaster for destroying the former quasi-monopoly of the large publishers and their classifieds sections. Rather, Craigslist’s success is likely to further bolster Buckmaster’s position and his strong belief in the flexibility of small companies, a belief that regards the business behemoths as fundamentally “dysfunctional”.</p>
<p>*Turner, Fred (2006): From Counterculture to Cyberculture, Chicago: Chicago University Press</p>
<p><span class="small">Translation: Oliver Heinemann</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.ejo.ch/338/marketing_advertising/we-react-to-the-customers-demands-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers in Search of Job Advertisements</title>
		<link>http://en.ejo.ch/337/marketing_advertising/newspapers-in-search-of-job-advertisements-2</link>
		<comments>http://en.ejo.ch/337/marketing_advertising/newspapers-in-search-of-job-advertisements-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neue Zürcher Zeitung, February 01, 2004 Two studies from Germany and the USA For three years now, the media industry has been confronted with a continuing decline in demand for employment advertising. Newspapers have been especially hard hit by this downturn. A fact, that can only partially be explained with poor economic conditions, as two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p class="small">Neue Zürcher Zeitung, February 01, 2004</p>
<p><strong>Two studies from Germany and the USA</strong><br />
For three years now, the media industry has been confronted with a continuing decline in demand for employment advertising. Newspapers have been especially hard hit by this downturn. A fact, that can only partially be explained with poor economic conditions, as two recently published studies show.</p>
</div>
<p><span id="more-337"></span></p>
<div>
<p>The index of job advertisements in daily Swiss newspapers compiled by the recruitment agency Manpower has seen a slight rise for the second time in a row this past December. This cannot, however, cover the fact that the market for recruitment advertising is in deep crisis. While the total advertising volume in Swiss daily newspapers decreased by 30 per cent between 2000 and 2003, job classifieds registered a decrease of 60 per cent during the same period.</p>
<p><strong>Migration of classifieds</strong></p>
<p>Newspapers in Germany fared no better. According to a recent study published by the consulting firm Ernst &amp; Young* under the title <em>Zeitungsverlage im Umbruch</em> (<em>Newspaper publishers under turmoil</em>), the volume of job advertisements in Germany decreased by nearly 70 per cent in the past three years. Although job classifieds are strongly influenced by business cycles and therefore extremely volatile, a collapse of this magnitude has never been seen before. The consultants are predicting a dark future for the industry. To them, high profit margins for newspaper publishers are a thing of the past as is the &#8220;dual financing concept&#8221; &#8211; two thirds of income from advertising, one third from sales. They predict that, in the long run, the classifieds business, which constitutes the main part of daily newspapers’ income from advertising, will be lost to the competition on the Internet. The advantages of the Web with its various search options are too great in comparison to the printed press.</p>
<p>Recruitment advertising &#8211; particularly important to large (supraregional) newspapers – is the category most threatened by the World Wide Web. In recent years, many companies have gone over to posting a large part of their vacancies on the Internet; in newspapers, ads are placed mostly for image reasons. Nevertheless, 50 per cent of the media managers questioned for the study still hold the economic downturn to be responsible for the slump in the classifieds business. According to Ernst &amp; Young, however, this hope is &#8220;to a large extent unfounded&#8221;, since the current newspaper crisis is just as much due to structural reasons as to the competition from the Internet or the changing behavior in media consumption; and the shift of classifieds to the Internet can no longer be stopped. Therefore, the report advises newspaper publishers to “buy into” large recruitment websites. Only thus can they prevent themselves from being pushed out of a market that was under their control not too long ago.</p>
<p><strong>Slight confidence in the USA</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;[T]his war is far from over&#8221;, states a study published in January by Borrell Associates** on the fight between US newspaper publishers and online services for recruitment dollars. In the past three years, the US press as well has suffered a painful decrease in revenues from job ads from 9.1 billion dollars to an estimated 4.5 billion dollars. And according to Borrell, this decline is mainly due to structural changes: the share of job vacancies published on the Internet increased from a mere 4 per cent in 1998 to more than 18 per cent in 2002, while the newspaper industry&#8217;s share of recruitment spending registered a decrease from 51 per cent to 38 per cent. Particularly in medium and small markets, which account for 60 percent of all recruitment revenues, job listings are, however, still firmly in the hands of newspaper publishers. Furthermore, newspaper cooperation projects in the online recruitment sector, whose market size is estimated at 3.1 billion dollars, are starting to show results: In the past year, newspaper recruitment websites and joint ventures between newspaper publishers such as CareerBuilder and CareerSites, in aggregate, were able to equal the revenue of market leader Monster.com.</p>
<p><strong>Rates under pressure</strong></p>
<p>Just like Ernst &amp; Young, the study conducted by Borrell Associates concludes that newspaper advertising rates will come under pressure from the Internet. It therefore does not come as a surprise that, a few months ago, the Swiss Federation of Ad Buyers (Schweizer Werbeauftraggeber Verband ), whose members account for as much as 70 per cent of the Swiss advertising market, was threatening publishers by stating: &#8220;If newspaper publishers do not act now and offer fair rates for job advertisements, they will have to acknowledge the fact that there are other options for recruiting personnel.&#8221;</p>
<p>* www.ernst young.de<br />
** www.borrellassociates.com</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://en.ejo.ch/337/marketing_advertising/newspapers-in-search-of-job-advertisements-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

